Webinar on International Research — update and link to Bibliography

For the full programme and CVs of presenters and panelists, see  https://iflaltr.wordpress.com/international-research-in-lis/.

I have added a link to my brief annotated bibliography of international and comparative LIS research.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Webinar on International Research in LIS


I’m pleased to post here the announcement of a forthcoming webinar on International Research in LIS organized by IFLA’s section for Library Theory and Research.

IFLA Webinar: International Research in LIS

Wednesday, May 26 at 17:00 – 18:30 Central European Time CET/UTC+1

Registration Link: https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_RiZ4D19BQtG1kap1rKjdLA

Cost: Free

This webinar will explore international and comparative research in Library and Information Science (LIS). Peter Lor, former IFLA Secretary General and the author of International and Comparative Librarianship will give an introductory talk to examine what is meant by international and comparative research in LIS, what can be learned from such research, and outline what special pitfalls and challenges are to be considered. The introduction will be followed by a panel of LIS journal editors discussing and evaluating the international and comparative LIS research submitted to their journals. The webinar will also include two presentations of international research by Anna Maria Tammaro and Amy van Scoy.


●      Peter Lor (University of Pretoria, South Africa)

●      Anna Maria Tammaro (University of Parma, Italy)

●      Amy van Scoy (University at Buffalo, USA)


●      Kendra Albright and Theo Bothma (Libri)

●      Juan Daniel Machin Mastromatteo (Information Development)

●      Steve Witt (IFLA Journal)

Moderators: Krystyna Matusiak (University of Denver, USA), Egbert Sanchez (National Autonomous University of Mexico), and Stefan Schmunk (University of Applied Sciences Darmstadt, Germany)

Organized by the IFLA Library Theory and Research

​Come and join us, and please share this invitation with colleagues in your region and professional network.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Global gleanings #7

An infodemic: bad news

In an earlier column I referred to the “infodemic”: a veritable avalanche of news, information, and misinformation that has accompanied the Covid-19 pandemic. Misinformation in a health crisis can have serious, even fatal, consequences.[1] Comments by opinion leaders such as Brazil’s President Jair Bolsanaro (“it’s just a little flu”)[2] or President Trump (“It will just go away, you’ll see”)[3] can seriously undermine the efforts of their epidemiologists and public health workers to bring the pandemic under control. This is illustrated by the high rates of infection in Brazil and the USA respectively. The misinformation put out by “viral” social media messages and by slick anti-establishment, pseudo-science websites spreads like wildfire, stoking distrust, suspicion, frustration and anger. My mother used to quote a Dutch proverb to the effect that, “no matter how fast a lie runs, the truth will always catch up with it”. Unfortunately, today that is no longer true. By the time the facts have been checked and the correct information is disseminated, the offending message, having done its mischief,  has already been forgotten, buried in a layer of new misinformation.

Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

Global Gleanings #6

My column of news, views and snippets from the international literature of books, libraries, and information, appears in every issue of LIASA-in-Touch, the newsletter of the Library and Information Association of South Africa. Here it is with clickable links.

Covid-19 – Going, going, gone?

The pandemic is still with us, but libraries are re-opening. IFLA has a web page listing “key resources for libraries in responding to the Coronavirus pandemic”.1 A great deal is being written about how this should be done, one of the issues being how to ensure that books and other library materials do not transmit the virus from one user to the next. In the United States, OCLC, the Institute of Museum and Library Services and the Battelle Memorial Institute have been cooperating on a project to determine how long the virus survives on the materials we commonly deal with. This is called the REALM (Reopening Archives, Libraries, and Museums) project. Four series of tests have been conducted so far. In the fourth, it was found that the Covid-19 virus is still detectable after six days on four common library materials when they are stacked: the covers of hardcover books, paperbacks, DVD cases and Mylar protective book cover jackets.2 A Google search shows how thinking on this is changing as we learn more. For now, it seems, “the best disinfectant for library materials is time.”3

Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

2020 John Ames Humphry/OCLC/Forest Press Award

I’m pleased to share the news that the American Library Association (ALA) has honoured me with the John Ames Humphry/OCLC/Forest Press Award for 2020. The award was presented virtually during the ALA’s Annual Conference in June – which unfortunately I missed.

Since 1987 the award, sponsored by OCLC/Forest Press, has been made annually to a “librarian or person who has made significant contributions to international librarianship.” The citation reads in part, “for over forty years, Dr. Lor has demonstrated his passion for international leadership through his teaching contributions and efforts to guide a new generation of globally-minded librarians. He has worked, often simultaneously, at multiple institutions across the globe teaching library science courses including international and comparative library and information studies”. The ALA’s press release and award citation can be read here.

According to the award’s web page, it was created on the occasion of the retirement of John Humphry as Executive Director of Forest Press, publisher of the Dewey Decimal Classification, to recognize Humphry’s far-ranging work to internationalize the English language editions of Dewey and to ensure that translations were adapted to meet the needs of other cultures and countries. I’m honoured to join the ranks of past recipients, such as Henriette Avram (1990), Robert D. Stueart (1994), Robert Wedgeworth (2000), Marianna Tax Choldin (2005), Winston Tabb (2007), Ismael Abdullahi (2018), and Debora Jacobs (2019), all of whom made major contributions to international librarianship.


Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Global Gleanings #5

Covid-19 again

When my previous column was written the news was dominated by Covid-19.[1] It was still mostly called an epidemic; the word ‘pandemic’ was only just coming into use. In South Africa a lock-down loomed. I reported on some of the ways in which libraries were being affected and how they were responding, but it seemed to me hardly worthwhile to continue collecting more literature on library responses to Covid-19, since it would be over by the time the next column appeared. How wrong I was! How wrong we all were. That includes health professionals, scientists, advisory panels, and politicians.[2] We simply did not know. In this column I revisit the impact of Covid-19 on libraries overseas and how they are responding.

The literature on Covid-19 and LIS has grown enormously. The topics addressed include what librarians are doing to serve their users during the pandemic, how libraries can plan to reopen safely, how our environment might change in the longer term as a result of the pandemic, and how to deal with the ‘infodemic’ of fake news and conspiracy theories that has erupted along with the pandemic itself. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Global gleanings #4: Coronavirus; library programmes; ancient manuscripts

This is a slightly expanded version of my column of news, views and snippets from the international literature of books, libraries, and information, which appears in LIASA-in-Touch, the newsletter of the Library and Information Association of South Africa.


The Coronavirus (COVID-19) and libraries

As I write this the news is dominated by the Coronavirus epidemic/pandemic. It is encouraging to see how quickly libraries have been responding to the emerging and rapidly evolving situation. A quick search in Google for “public libraries and Corona virus” turns up a slew of library web pages devoted to it. A good example is the site of the Oak Park Public Library, in Illinois, USA, which offers a page dated 3 March 2020: https://oppl.org/news-events/announcements/coronavirus-and-your-library/). Under the heading “Coronavirus and your library” the Library offers detailed information sourced directly from the US Centers for Disease Control (CDC). It includes links to travel guidance related to COVID-19 as well as clinical guidance (including a picture of the test kit used for testing for the virus), and some information specifically about how emergency alerts are disseminated in Oak Bay. As a matter of interest, the Village of Oak Bay is a relatively affluent town adjacent to Chicago, and it is known for its architectural treasures in the “Prairie Style” of architecture. Visitors can see a large number of historic buildings designed by Frank Lloyd Wright and other architects working in the Prairie Style (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Lloyd_Wright#Prairie_style_houses_(1900%E2%80%931914).)

You will not believe what librarians don’t all get up to

The rapid response to the Coronavirus illustrates an admirable characteristic of American public librarians: they are aware of the events, issues, needs and crises preoccupying their communities, and they respond quickly – sometimes with anxious soul-searching, but often with practical measures and imaginative programmes. As the following examples show, this is not limited to public librarians. Continue reading

Posted in LIS, Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Reviews of International and Comparative Librarianship: concepts and methods…

Since my last post on this topic, two new reviews of my book have appeared. More details appear under the heading Reviews and author interviews. I mention there a substantial and scholarly review article in Italian by Dr Anna Bilotta, in which she discusses the book in some detail, and also places it in the context of earlier literature.

This also drew my attention to an earlier article by her:

Bilotta, Anna. 2018. ‘Passato e presente della biblioteconomia comparata: scopi, approcci, ricerche [Past and present of comparative librarianship: aims, approaches, research]’. Biblioteche oggi Trends 4 (1): 48–63. doi:10.3302/2421-3810-201801-048-1.

This is a thorough and insightful overview of the main aims and methodological challenges of comparison in libraries. She discusses the development of the field over the years, the relationship between comparative and international librarianship, definitions and aims of comparative librarianship, aims of comparison, the main methodological problems, various approaches to comparison, and stages of a comparative study. She also gives an overview of some of the more important studies, covering much the same literature as I did in my Chapter 2, but adding useful references to some Italian and English-language items I had missed.

I find it gratifying to see not only that the book has been noticed beyond the English-speaking world, but also that the subject of international and comparative LIS is of sufficient interest in Italy to generate an article of this quality and scope.


Posted in Comparative Librarianship, LIS, The Book | Leave a comment

This Blog

In the course of a long career in librarianship – as a librarian, manager, professional leader, researcher and teacher – and through many years of participation in international programmes and activities, I have held the belief that libraries and information services contribute to peace and justice through the global exchange and sharing of information and knowledge. This site is intended as a resource for all who are interested in international and comparative aspects of librarianship and information work. I focus on matters with a conceptual and historic slant, including LIS development and the international political economy of information, roughly those matters covered in my recent book. But I also indulge myself sometimes and blog to air my opinions on other topics as well.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

International Library History News

In my work in international and comparative librarianship and information work, I make much use of historical material. Some comparative work is purely synchronic, considering  situations across cultures, societies or countries as things stand at a given moment in time, mostly the present or very recently. But if we want to know why things are the way they are and why they differ between the units being compared, we need a diachronic element as well. This lends much more depth to a comparative study.

So I’m grateful to Brett Spencer, editor of the American Library Association Library History Round Table’s blog, for drawing my attention to “International Library History News“. This is the International history page of LHRT News and Notes, the newsletter of the History Round Table.  Continue reading

Posted in International Librarianship, LIS | Leave a comment