Satellite Meeting of IFLA’s Library History Special Interest Group

Are you interested in the Belle Époque, internationalism, and the history and archival sources of libraries, library associations, documentation and information science more generally?  Here is an update on an upcoming meeting, announced earlier, which you should not miss.

From 17 to 19 August 2023 the IFLA Library History Special Interest Group (Lib Hist SIG), in collaboration with the Ass0ciation for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T) is holding a preconference Satellite Meeting in Mons, Belgium, focusing on Preserving our origins: Approaches to the organization, curation, and historiography  of the record of national and international organizations in libraries, information and documentation.

This event takes place in Mons, Belgium, in the Mundaneum. Continue reading

Posted in Belle Epoque, IFLA, Library history, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

A Milestone: Danton’s Dimensions of Comparative Librarianship published 50 years ago

The 1970s saw the publication of several noteworthy contributions to the theory and methodology of comparative librarianship. The first was Simsova and MacKee’s (1970) Handbook of comparative librarianship, a pioneering but ultimately disappointing work, of which a revised edition followed in 1975 (Simsova and MacKee 1975). I call it ‘disappointing’ because barely seventy of its 548 pages, “Part 1, Comparative librarianship and comparative method”, dealt with theory and methodology, and that rather superficially. Simsova was strongly influenced by pioneers of comparative education such as George Z.F Bereday (1964) and followed his rather mechanistic approach to comparisons between countries. The remaining 460 pages of the book is devoted to an eclectic “Guide to sources”, contributed by MacKee, and organized mainly by country. Nevertheless, this book was influential in stimulating international and comparative librarianship studies in the United Kingdom.

The second work that should be mentioned is an entry on “Comparative Librarianship” by Dorothy Collings in the Encyclopedia of library and information science (Collings 1971). Collings pioneered the teaching of the subject in the USA, where she taught it as Columbia University from 1956-1971. For her course she had developed an “Outline  for the study of a foreign library system”, which was later reprinted by Simsova (1982). This inventory is still useful, albeit very outdated. After Columbia she returned to Jamaica, where she established a library science course at the University of the West Indies.  Her career and influence have been discussed by Jackson (2001).

Joseph Periam Danton (1908-2002) (C) Guggenheim Foundation

Having missed the anniversaries of these two pioneering works, I come to a true golden jubilee, that of J. Periam Danton’s Dimensions of comparative librarianship (Danton 1973).

Joseph Periam Danton (1908-2002) had a long and distinguished career in library education and international librarianship. The latter should be no surprise, given his educational and working background. His parents were German language educators who moved to Beijing in 1916 and stayed there for ten years. In 1924 he enrolled at Oberlin College in Ohio to study German. He spent an academic year in Leipzig, Germany, where his parents were then teaching. After graduating with a BA in German, Danton obtained a BS in Library Science at the library school of Columbia University. He then studied part-time for a master’s degree in German. In 1930 he was recruited by the ALA as secretary to its chief executive, Carl Milam, who was active in IFLA and in other international initiatives. Continue reading

Posted in Comparative Librarianship, Library history | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

Global Gleanings # 16: More disruption: chatbots in the news

This quarterly column of news, views and snippets from the international literature of books, libraries, and information, appears in LIASA-in-Touch, the newsletter of the Library and Information Association of South Africa.

Generative artificial intelligence

Image: ChatGPT Hub, https://www.chatgpthub.com.br/quem-e-dono-do-chatgpt/

What is ChatGPT? Image: ChatGPTHub, https://www.chatgpthub.com.br/quem-e-dono-do-chatgpt/

What is ChatGPT?At time of writing the big tech news is about ChatGPT-4, the latest version of a generative artificial-intelligence (AI) chatbot launched in November 2022 by a OpenAI, a partly non-profit and partly for-profit artificial intelligence research laboratory based in San Francisco, California. Elon Musk was a co-founder, but has in the meantime pulled out. Microsoft made a large investment in this project, whilst other dominant IT companies such as Google and Amazon are rushing to bring out their own generative AI systems. It has generated much excitement and some apprehension.

Continue reading

Posted in Copyright, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

IFLA Satellite Conference at the Mundaneum

I’m delighted to share that the IFLA Library History Special Interest Group has organized a Satellite Conference to be held from 17 to 19 August, in Mons, Belgium. The Satellite Conference will immediately precede IFLA’s 2023 World Library and Information Conference (WLIC), which will be held in Rotterdam, the Netherlands, from 20 to 24 August.

Worldwide organization of knowledge, diagram by Paul Otlet

The theme of the Satellite Conference is “Preserving our origins: Approaches to the organization, curation, and historiography of the record of national and international organizations in libraries, information, and documentation.” It has two aims: (1) to build on our understanding of the state of preservation and accessibility of historical sources for the historiography of library information sciences (LIS) and information science and technology organizations; and (2) to further explore the history of these organizations from their origins in the late 19th and early 20th century to today. Continue reading

Posted in International Librarianship, Library history, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

JLIS.it issue on peer review

 

Most readers of this blog will have published articles in peer-reviewed journals. Many of us will have also spent many unpaid hours participating in the reviewing process. It is, in fact, an expensive process, expensive in terms of both pain and money, a “pain point” for authors  and reviewers, as pointed out by Pippa Smart (2016). As an author and reviewer, I agree with Smart’s comment on pain! In particular, I find being commandeered by the algorithms employed in publishers’ computerized article management systems a proverbial pain in the neck. Continue reading

Posted in International Librarianship, LIS | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Global Gleanings #15: Disruption, disruption…

This quarterly column of news, views and snippets from the international literature of books, libraries, and information, appears in LIASA-in-Touch, the newsletter of the Library and Information Association of South Africa.

 Long Covid

The worst of the disruptive Covid pandemic is behind us, we hope. But Covid has not gone away altogether. Here I’m not only thinking of ‘Long Covid’, but also of more far-reaching consequences. The world is experiencing long-term social, economic, and political effects, which do not leave LIS untouched. Much has already been published on how libraries have responded and coped. Several insightful articles on this appeared in a special issue of IFLA journal. Dobreva and Angelescu (2022) pointed out that we are living in the Covid-19 era, not the Covid-19 crisis. We are in it for the long haul. A report on a large-scale survey conducted in Australia concluded that libraries had shown that they could respond in an agile and adaptable manner, and that Covid had demonstrated the value to communities of library buildings (Wakeling et al. 2022). Continue reading

Posted in International Librarianship, LIS, Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Submissions to parliamentary hearings

Following up on my previous post, I can report that today (7 March 2023) I participated virtually in a hearing of the Standing Committee on Finance, Economic Opportunities, and Tourism, of the Parliament of the Western Cape Province, Cape Town, held in Cape Town and virtually. Here is the text of my remarks. It is followed by an earlier written submission.

Continue reading

Posted in Copyright, Information justice, South Africa, Uncategorized | Tagged | 2 Comments

Unlikely allies oppose signing of South Africa’s Copyright Amendment Bill

In a previous post I wrote about South Africa’s seemingly never-ending struggle to enact new legislation to update its 1978 vintage copyright law. The Copyright Amendment Bill, Bill 2023-01-05, which has been in the making for the best part of a decade, is intended to update the South African copyright regime by providing explicitly for limitations and exceptions that  form an accepted part of copyright law in many developed countries (Nicholson 2022b). By incorporating these exceptions and limitations, the Bill seeks to remove obstacles that impede access to information for students, researchers, and content creators. These obstacles have so far prevented South Africa’s ratification of the 2013 Marrakesh Treaty to enable cross-border exchange of accessible formats for the visually handicapped. The Bill will also remove provisions that inhibit access to orphan works. It will allow librarians legally to copy rare and fragile materials for preservation purposes (Nicholson 2022a).

A typical university library copying and scanning facility. Image: Image: Kings Western University, Canada, https://www.kings.uwo.ca/library/services-spaces/print-copy-scan/

The revised Bill was passed by the National Assembly on 1 September 2022, by 163 votes (including those of the governing African National Congress) to 45. The 45 opposing votes came from five parties, including the Democratic Alliance (DA), which is the official opposition, and the third largest party in Parliament, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). (Nicholson 2022a). At first sight this is puzzling.  Why did these two, which are diametrically opposed ideologically speaking, both oppose the bill? Continue reading

Posted in Information justice, South Africa, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Surveying copyright legislation in the Global South

Last year an announcement on IFLA’s e-mail discussion list, IFLA-L alerted me to the appearance of a new copyright guide for Brazilian libraries, Guia para bibliotecas: Direitos autorais  e acesso ao conhecimento, informação e cultura [Guide for libraries: Authors’rights and access to knowledge, information and culture]  (Couto et al. 2022). Issued as an ebook, it is intended to help librarians navigate their way through legislation that governs access to knowledge, information and culture, in such a way that optimum use is made of the rights of libraries and their users. Librarians should obey the law, without being so intimidated by the complexity of laws and regulations that users are deprived of access to resources to which they are legally entitled.

Continue reading

Posted in Africa, Comparative Librarianship, Copyright, International Librarianship, Latin America, LIS, Research | Leave a comment

Some updates

Keeping a site up to date involves chores that can easily be overlooked. Today I was horrified to discover that my narrative list of presentations had not been updated since 2018, and worse: my lists of publications and of conference and other presentations ended in 2009. That has now been rectified here, just in time for the new year.

While on the subject of the new year, I wish all who intentionally or (more likely) unsuspectingly, land up on this blog, a wonderful, productive, civil, tolerant, and peaceful 2023. May the drones drop out of the skies in uninhabited places, may the guns fall silent, may infants and grandparents sleep peacefully in their own beds, and may the words of Isaiah 9:5 come true:

Every warrior’s boot used in battle, and every garment rolled in blood will be destined for burning, will be fuel for the fire.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment